DeFi

Railgun governance votes to send $365,000 to aid Harmony’s $100m hack recovery

Railgun governance votes to send $365,000 to aid Harmony’s $100m hack recovery

Railgun voted to donate 200 ETH to Harmony Protocol. /Credit: Rita Fortunato/DL News

  • The Railgun community recently sent $365,000 in Ether to support Harmony to aid the latter’s recovery of hacked bridge funds.
  • Suspected North Korean hackers stole $100 million from Harmony’s bridge protocol last year.
  • The decentralised and automated manner of the donation was particularly noteworthy.

The Railgun DAO community sent Ether worth over $365,000 to layer 1 blockchain Harmony Protocol on October 11 in a “gesture of goodwill” geared towards aiding Harmony’s recovery for its Horizon bridge. The bridge suffered a $100 million hack last year at the hands of suspected North Korean hackers.

This devastating hack, as well as reports of mismanagement by Harmony’s top hierarchy, has since dampened the promise of the once-high-flying project that controlled over $1 billion in investor funds at its peak last year. Harmony now only sits on $2.25 million, according to DefiLlama data.

While the donation is a notable case of philanthropy among crypto projects, Railgun proponents say the decentralised and automated manner in which the donation occurred is even more noteworthy.

Now read
Harmony execs mismanaged funds and bullied workers, ex-staff claim
Harmony execs mismanaged funds and bullied workers, ex-staff claim
Former contractors for the Simple Rules Company, which develops and maintains the once-thriving...

Railgun is a DeFi privacy protocol managed by a decentralised community of the same name.

The road to the eventual donation began with a self-executing proposal submitted by an anonymous author to the Railgun governance. Self-executing proposals do not require DAO members with higher powers to execute them. Once the DAO votes, the smart contract code in the proposals immediately triggers the agreed-upon changes to the project’s codebase.

This self-executing proposal was possible because of the nature of Railgun’s governance which is itself a self-executing DAO.

“Railgun governance is decentralised and anyone can submit a proposal at any time,” Bill Liang, a Railgun community advocate told DL News. “All governance actions happen on-chain and are auditable.”

Now read
How North Korea used LinkedIn and social engineering to steal $3.4bn in crypto
How North Korea used LinkedIn and social engineering to steal $3.4bn in crypto
North Korean hackers have stolen at least $3.4 billion in crypto — in part by preying on victims via...

The anonymous author included all the nuts and bolts required for the proposal from submission to execution. This included the smart contracts to direct funds from the project’s treasury toward the donation. In all, the process took nine days from proposal to execution, a Railgun community twitter page said.

Risks and rewards of self-executing DAOs

Not all DAOs operate in the same manner. While members who own governance tokens can vote, only those who own a certain number of these tokens have the power to submit proposals. Furthermore, only the project’s core team or other third-party agents with administrative keys or special permissions are the ones who actually execute the changes contained in approved DAO proposals.

Now read
Fireblocks and Israel’s web3 sector launch crypto donation wallet to aid war victims
Fireblocks and Israel’s web3 sector launch crypto donation wallet to aid war victims
Israel’s web3 sector is setting up a crypto donations wallet to raise funds for Israeli citizens who...

While self-executing DAOs push the boundaries of decentralised automation, they are not without significant risks. Bad actors can hack the voting process and introduce malicious codes to suit their nefarious purposes. Such incidents have happened in the past, including the infamous The DAO hack of 2016 and Beanstalk, an Ethereum-based stablecoin project exploited for $182 million in April 2022.

Given these risks, self-executing DAOs have circuit breakers in the form of post-voting audits and reviews, as well as special councils for emergency situations.

In Railgun’s case, the community is incentivised to audit all governance actions, Liang said.

“There are thousands of people checking the proposals every week and it would be functionally impossible to sneak such a proposal through,” Liang said.

Osato Avan-Nomayo is our Nigeria-based DeFi correspondent. He covers DeFi and tech. To share tips or information about stories, please contact him at osato@dlnews.com.

Comments, queries, feedback?

NEWSLETTERS

Get key insights and expert analysis in our weekly newsletters

The RoundupThe DecentralisedThe Guidance
Choose your topics
The Roundup
The Roundup
A recap of the week's top stories
The Decentralised
The Decentralised
Your weekly guide to the world of DeFi
The Guidance
The Guidance
Your weekly guide to global regulation in crypto and DeFi